The Appalachian Entrepreneurship Education Continuum

Back to Atlas

Multi-level educational framework integrating entrepreneurship education across K-12 and higher education systems in Appalachia to build entrepreneurial mindset and capabilities among regional youth.
What are the main aims and objectives?

The primary objectives of the Entrepreneurship Education Continuum are to prepare the next generation of entrepreneurial leaders and thinkers in the Appalachian region; to cultivate entrepreneurial mindset, creativity, and problem-solving skills essential for success in all careers; to increase the proportion of youth considering business creation as a viable career option; to develop essential business, economic development, and financial acumen among Appalachian youth; and to create visible role models and success stories demonstrating that entrepreneurship is achievable in Appalachian communities.

The continuum aims to boost local economies by nurturing an entrepreneurial mindset in students, empowering them to become business leaders creating new businesses in their local communities; to create employment by instilling entrepreneurial spirit enabling youth to create opportunities for themselves and others to stay and work in local communities; to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills essential for success in any career even if students have no intention of starting their own business; to enable community revitalization by empowering students to identify and address community needs through entrepreneurial solutions; to combat brain drain by demonstrating that economic opportunity and entrepreneurial careers are available in Appalachia, enabling graduates to build careers locally rather than relocating to urban centers; to support 99% of the region's economy comprising small businesses by preparing future business owners and leaders; and to demonstrate that entrepreneurship is not limited to high-tech sectors but applies to all industries and community types across Appalachia.

How does the program work?

The Appalachian Entrepreneurship Education Continuum operates through multiple coordinated mechanisms spanning K-12 education and summer intensive programs:

K-12 Entrepreneurship Education Integration:

The Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) and partners work to integrate entrepreneurship education into regular school curricula at middle school and high school levels across the Appalachian region. This includes development of entrepreneurship courses, infusion of entrepreneurship concepts into business curriculum, and teacher professional development enabling educators to teach entrepreneurship effectively. West Virginia, for example, developed an Entrepreneurship & Innovation Program of Study available through schools, and ARC encourages other states to adopt similar curricula.

Appalachian Entrepreneurship Academy (AEA):

The flagship AEA program operates as a two-week intensive residential summer program held at Appalachian State University in Boone, North Carolina. The program accepts 26 high school students (grades 9-11) from across the 13-state Appalachian region through competitive application process. Students participate in experiential learning designed to develop essential entrepreneurial skills including ideation, business planning, prototyping, and pitching. All program costs (housing, meals, transportation, learning materials) are covered for participants at no cost. Students develop and implement their own business ideas, refine those ideas through feedback and testing, and deliver pitch presentations to panels of entrepreneurs in a "shark tank"-style competition. The program emphasizes celebrating Appalachian culture and community, with students exploring local attractions, arts, and music performances to develop ideas maintaining and sustaining critical community aspects.

Program Partnerships:

AEA operates through partnerships between ARC, Appalachian State University, STEM West, the National Consortium for Entrepreneurship Education (EntreEd), and regional organizations. These partnerships provide expertise in entrepreneurship education, university resources and facilities, community connections, and sustainable program infrastructure.

Regional Educator Support:

ARC and partners provide support to educators integrating entrepreneurship into classrooms through professional development, access to curriculum resources, and participation in regional entrepreneurship conferences and educational forums, including sponsorships and awards recognizing entrepreneurship education innovations.

What is the overall cost?

No information available. 

How was it implemented?

The origins of the Entrepreneurship Education Continuum trace to the ARC Entrepreneurship Initiative established in 1997, responding to Appalachia's vulnerability to economic disruption from declining sectors (timber, textiles, tobacco cutbacks). ARC leadership recognized entrepreneurship as "critical element in the establishment of self-sustaining communities that create jobs, build local wealth, and contribute broadly to economic and community development." The EI invested nearly $43 million in five program categories including entrepreneurship education, access to capital, business incubators, sector interventions, and technical assistance.

The EI's entrepreneurship education category was one of five core program areas and included investment in youth and educator training. Evaluation documented over 11,500 students and teachers participating in or receiving training in EI-funded entrepreneurship education projects during the 1997-2005 period.

Following the formal conclusion of EI in 2005, ARC continued supporting entrepreneurship development through its Asset-Based Development Initiative (launched 2005), maintaining momentum and building on the foundation laid by EI investments. The agency consolidated learnings and began systematizing entrepreneurship education as core component of regional economic development strategy.

The Appalachian Entrepreneurship Academy was developed as flagship intensive summer program, initially hosted at Appalachian State University and operated in partnership with the National Consortium for Entrepreneurship Education (EntreEd) and STEM West. The AEA formalized residential summer learning experience for high school youth, representing institutionalization of entrepreneurship education continuum concept.

States within Appalachia increasingly developed formal K-12 entrepreneurship curricula. West Virginia, for example, developed Entrepreneurship & Innovation Program of Study available through schools. ARC began promoting adoption of such curricula across participating states and providing resources to help educators integrate entrepreneurship.

What impact has been measured?

Through the ARC Entrepreneurship Initiative (1997-2005) alone, over 11,500 students and teachers participated in or received training in entrepreneurship education projects. The evaluation documented that 88 projects included in detailed sample evaluation involved over 11,500 student and teacher participants.

What lessons can be learned?
  • Education precedes and enables business creation: The EI evaluation identified entrepreneurship education as foundational element of successful entrepreneurship ecosystems, with later business and capital initiatives building on foundation of educational awareness and skill development. The continuum's multi-level approach from K-12 through college models recognition that early entrepreneurship exposure shapes later career choices.
  • Youth and teacher attitude change requires sustained exposure: The EI evaluation explicitly documented that ARC investments "helped to change people's attitudes, particularly among youth and their teachers," suggesting that mindset shifts in education systems require multiyear commitment and repeated exposure through curricula, professional development, and role models.
  • Regional mindset shift requires institutional change beyond individual programs: The finding that "nearly all Appalachian states are now involved in some form of organized efforts to promote entrepreneurial development" demonstrates that successful educational continuum shifts broader regional perspective through state-level curriculum adoption, educator professional development, and policy changes beyond individual summer programs.
  • Residential programs create intense concentrated learning experiences: The AEA's effectiveness in developing business acumen, pitching skills, and entrepreneurial confidence through two-week residential model with full cost coverage suggests that intensive immersive experiences create learning depth not achievable through part-time school-based instruction, though at higher per-student cost.
  • Celebratory approach to Appalachian culture strengthens engagement and relevance: The AEA's intentional focus on celebrating Appalachian culture through local community exploration, arts, and music, and on developing business ideas addressing community needs, generated stronger participant engagement than would generic entrepreneurship education, suggesting cultural relevance drives educational effectiveness.
  • Competitive application process creates selection bias and peer effects: AEA's competitive selection of 26 participants from hundreds of applicants ensures participant self-selection of highly motivated students, suggesting both positive effect (highly motivated cohorts) and limitation (doesn't reach less-motivated youth who may benefit most).
  • K-12 integration requires sustained curriculum implementation and educator support: Despite decades of ARC support for entrepreneurship education, K-12 integration varies substantially across Appalachian states, suggesting that curriculum adoption requires not just resource provision but sustained educator professional development, technical support, and accountability to ensure implementation fidelity.
  • Seven-component entrepreneurial ecosystem framework provides comprehensive guide: The research-based identification of seven building blocks (talent, market access, culture, regulatory support, assistance, capital, infrastructure) provides systematic framework for assessing and developing educational continuum within broader ecosystem context, suggesting holistic approach more effective than isolated education focus.
  • Limited long-term career trajectory tracking constrains optimization: The absence of systematic longitudinal tracking of AEA and other continuum participants into college, employment, and business creation prevents evidence-based assessment of which program elements (residential vs. school-based, duration, specific content) drive greatest impact on participants' entrepreneurial career trajectories.
  • Regional educational disparities persist: While ARC has invested in entrepreneurship education regionwide, variation in state-level curriculum adoption and educator capacity suggests that resource constraints in rural and lower-income Appalachian communities may create unequal access to quality entrepreneurship education, requiring targeted support for less-resourced areas.
  • Lesson on ecosystem integration: The recognition through case studies that successful entrepreneurial communities share common traits (supportive culture embracing entrepreneurship, willingness to "think big," diverse building block development) suggests that entrepreneurship education is most effective when embedded in broader community ecosystem development rather than isolated school-based programs.
  • Brain drain mitigation requires visible economic opportunity: The continuum's explicit aim to reduce brain drain suggests recognition that entrepreneurship education alone is insufficient without visible business creation, job opportunities, and successful role models in communities, indicating need for complementary business support and capital access alongside education.
Notes + Additional Context

One of the recommendations which the Start Us Up Coalition included in America's New Business Plan is for the U.S. federal government "to ensure that a strong current of entrepreneurial talent is continuously emerging in the United States, policies must jumpstart the stagnant rate of new entrepreneurs, grow the next generation of business owners, and develop employees with entrepreneurial capabilities."

To do this, the Coalition recommends that policymakers:

  • Embed entrepreneurial know-how and spirit in classrooms throughout America by creating opportunities for students to explore and acquire the habits of mind, behaviors, skills, knowledge, and competencies that equip them to be entrepreneurial – whether by creating businesses themselves or by making contributions as employees and community members.
  • Provide students with real world learning experiences through project-based learning, client-based projects, and internships.
  • Give students opportunities to explore design thinking and prototyping, problem-solving and communications, as well as ensuring all students are leaving high school with basic financial literacy skills.
  • Examine how state agencies can better collaborate, collect appropriate data, provide curriculum and credit flexibility, and allow for alternative teacher certification pathways.
  • Monitor state funding formula implications that will support or incentivize real world learning within districts.
  • Ensure local entities work closely with employers, especially new businesses, on alignment of curriculum to workforce needs in order to ensure equity of access to employer-based learning opportunities.

Supporting Evidence:

  • Research has shown that with appropriate course content, entrepreneurial education and training in K-16 is linked to positive business outcomes (Grace Khoury, “Does Entrepreneurship Education Have a Role in developing Entrepreneurial Skills And Ventures’ Effectiveness?” Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, January 2012).
  • A meta-analysis found a significant relationship between entrepreneurship education and training and corresponding entrepreneurship outcomes (Bruce C. Marin, Jeffrey J. McNally, and Michael J. Kay, “Examining the Formation of Human Capital in Entrepreneurship: A Meta-Analysis of Entrepreneurship Education Outcomes,” Journal of Business Venturing vol. 28, no. 2 - March 2013: 211-224).

CURATED BY

Jason Wiens

Policy Director, Entrepreneurship
Ewing Marion Kauffman Fundation
United States