iFWD PH Program

Back to Atlas

A national two-phase program launched in May 2020 providing capacity building and innovation funding to help repatriated Overseas Filipino Workers establish technology-based enterprises.
What are the main aims and objectives?

The iFWD PH Program was established by the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) to provide alternative livelihood opportunities for displaced and repatriated Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) and their families in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The program aims to enable technology-based enterprise establishment that leverages OFW skills and experiences acquired abroad; promote innovation and entrepreneurship among OFWs returning to the Philippines; facilitate sustainable reintegration of OFWs through business ownership rather than temporary support; contribute to local economy through job creation, technology adoption, and economic growth; and support the national goal of transforming OFWs from workers seeking overseas employment into domestic technology entrepreneurs. The program explicitly focuses on science, technology, and innovation-based enterprises to position OFWs as innovators rather than subsistence workers, distinguishing it from general livelihood support programs.

How does the program work?

The iFWD PH Program operates through a structured two-phase model combining capacity building with financial support, implemented nationwide through DOST Regional Offices. The program is led by DOST-NCR (National Capital Region) as Project Leader, in partnership with the Department of Migrant Workers (formal partnership established 2024), Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA), Technology Business Incubators, and various non-governmental organizations.​

Phase 1: Capacity Building for Development and Management of Technology-Based Enterprises

This phase provides foundational training over approximately 3-4 months and includes core business development training covering fundamental entrepreneurship, business model development, financial management, and marketing strategies; business concept development where participants refine and validate business ideas with mentor guidance; business plan development with structured assistance in creating comprehensive plans required for Phase 2 funding application; Technology Business Ideation (Techbiz Ideation) sessions conducted with SCALE NCR (Strategic Collaborative Alliance Leveraging Ecosystem of Startups) partners introducing participants to entrepreneurial landscapes; basic technical trainings in specific technologies relevant to target business sectors; values in entrepreneurship training; and knowledge-sharing sessions with successful beneficiaries of earlier DOST programs.

Phase 2: Innovation Funding (iFund)

Participants who successfully complete Phase 1 and meet requirements can access innovation funding with maximum support of PHP 500,000 (approximately USD 9,000) per OFW beneficiary. The funding comprises two components: Technical Assistance of PHP 150,000 (approximately USD 2,700) and Equipment/Machinery of PHP 350,000 (approximately USD 6,300). This financing is provided at zero percent interest rate. Eligible expenses include equipment acquisition, technical staff trainings, product development, market testing and validation, consultancy services (food safety, product labeling), laboratory testing and shelf-life testing, packaging and labeling design and execution, rental of DOST or DOST-assisted facilities, technology business incubation, mentoring support, and feasibility studies.

Priority Technology-Based Business Sectors:

The program encourages OFWs to establish enterprises in eight priority sectors: food processing, furniture making, gifts/housewares/home decor, agriculture and aquaculture, metals and engineering, health and pharmaceuticals, software development, and creatives (design, multimedia).​

Post-Funding Support (Recent Editions):

As of 2024, Phase 2 includes business incubation programs for funded entrepreneurs, with expanded partnerships through SCALE NCR providing access to eight Technology Business Incubators including institutions such as De La Salle University Animo Labs, Mapua Think and Tinker Laboratory, and UPSCALE Innovation Hub.

What is the overall cost?

The Department of Science and Technology allocated PHP 5 million (approximately USD 100,000 at 2020 exchange rates) as the initial funding for the iFWD PH Program at its launch in May 2020.

How was it implemented?

The iFWD PH Program was created in rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic's devastating impact on Overseas Filipino Workers. Between March 15, 2020 (when first repatriations accelerated) and May 6, 2020, approximately 174,000 Filipinos were repatriated, with most being OFWs who lost overseas employment. An estimated 300,000-400,000 OFWs were affected nationwide as the tourism industry collapsed first (affecting sea-based workers), followed by mass layoffs across seafaring, hospitality, and service sectors. Stranded repatriates faced immediate survival challenges including transport difficulties, lockdown restrictions, and housing scams.​

Following planning sessions and consultations with government agencies, OFW groups, and development partners, DOST launched iFWD PH in May 2020 with initial funding allocation of PHP 5 million. The first cohort recruited 98 migrant workers nationwide in 2020, with the program designed as an alternative to re-employment abroad for those unable or unwilling to return to overseas work.​

The program expanded in 2021 with an additional 40 OFWs recruited for training, alongside regional rollouts in MIMAROPA region (30 OFWs in Batch Malikhain) and Caraga region (32 OFWs). By end of 2021, 205 OFWs had completed Phase 1 capacity building training across all regions, with 21 advancing to Phase 2 innovation funding. Implementation operated through DOST Regional Offices with support from OWWA Regional Welfare Offices, Department of Trade and Industry regional offices, and local government units.​

Initial partnerships included OWWA, Department of Trade and Industry, non-governmental organizations, state universities and colleges providing training facilities, and private sector mentors. However, early program data revealed a significant challenge: only 50% of initial 70 OFWs in the 2020-2021 cohorts completed Phase 1 and proceeded to Phase 2, indicating substantial dropout or disqualification rates between phases.​

By 2024, the program underwent significant institutional strengthening. A formal Memorandum of Understanding was signed with the Department of Migrant Workers, establishing DMW as co-implementing agency for regional-level implementation. The SCALE NCR partnership was formalized, creating a consortium of eight Technology Business Incubators providing mentorship support, business ideation modules, and post-funding incubation services. Partnership with Entrepinoy Volunteers Foundation (EVFI) provided core business development training expertise.​

A National Inception Meeting was convened November 7-8, 2024, where DOST-NCR brought together all regional focal coordinators to review the program from 2020-2024, discuss beneficiary profiles, assess progress and accomplishments, identify key performance indicators, highlight successes and improvement areas, and document challenges and best practices nationwide. This data-driven review led to revised eligibility guidelines and operational procedures to better respond to evolving OFW needs, introduction of Early Business Ideation Sessions (Phase 1 enhancement), and establishment of Business Incubation programs for Phase 2 funded entrepreneurs.

What impact has been measured?

The program has successfully facilitated technology-based enterprise creation with 106 OFW-owned and managed enterprises established since 2020, generating 213 jobs. The average annual gross sales per company reached PHP 28,216,100.82 (approximately USD 500,000-550,000), indicating funded enterprises are generating substantial revenue suggesting genuine business sustainability rather than micro-income activities.

The program provided capacity building activities to 921 OFWs on business ideation, development, and management cumulatively through 2024. This included 626+ OFWs trained specifically in business management and 247 OFWs trained in 2024 alone, demonstrating program acceleration. Training equipped OFWs with specific skills to launch technology-based businesses.

74 OFWs secured innovation funding for business implementation as of 2023, with 22 OFW enterprises provided Phase 2 funding in 2024 alone. These Phase 2 beneficiaries generated 104 employments (excluding the business owner positions themselves) as of 2023.

What lessons can be learned?
  • Significant Phase 1-to-Phase 2 Conversion Gap: Only 50% of Phase 1 participants advanced to Phase 2 funding in early program years. Of initial 70 OFWs in 2020-2021, only approximately 35 proceeded to funding phase. This dramatic dropout rate suggests Phase 1 training may not adequately prepare participants for Phase 2 requirements, business viability assessment may be inadequate, financial barriers (collateral, additional documentation) may prevent Phase 2 access, or OFW commitment may wane between training completion and funding application. This fundamental implementation gap significantly reduces the program's actual impact.
  • No Long-Term Business Sustainability Data: Despite reporting 106 enterprises and 213 jobs, the program provides no evidence that funded businesses remain operational beyond initial funding period, enterprises achieve long-term profitability and sustainability, average annual sales figures are sustained over time, or founders continue business operations as of 2024-2025. This gap prevents assessment of whether program creates lasting economic opportunity or temporary employment.
  • Limited Repatriation Persistence Measurement: The program's core objective is OFW reintegration, yet no data exists on what percentage of funded entrepreneurs remain in Philippines beyond mandatory compliance periods, whether repatriation is permanent or temporary, factors enabling or preventing long-term Philippines residence, or comparison with baseline repatriation rates.
  • Scam Vulnerability Exposed: A September 2022 warning documented scammers impersonating the program, using iFWD PH logo and materials to solicit unauthorized loans. This exposure indicates the program has insufficient fraud prevention mechanisms, OFWs may be confused about legitimate program offerings, government communication about program may be inadequate, and risk to program credibility and OFW trust exists.
  • Budget Constraints Threaten Sustainability: 2024 news reports indicated DOST faced budget cuts affecting program capacity. The PHP 5 million initial allocation (2020) may be inadequate for nationwide program. It is unclear whether program has sustained, dedicated budget or operates from annual discretionary allocations. Potential funding instability threatens program continuity and expansion.
  • Limited Information on Barriers to Success: The program provides no publicly available analysis of why 50% of Phase 1 participants do not advance to Phase 2, what business challenges funded entrepreneurs face, why some businesses may fail, geographic or demographic variations in success rates, or sector-specific success or failure patterns. Without this understanding, program refinement is limited to administrative changes rather than addressing root causes of underperformance.
  • Unclear Cost-Effectiveness: With no comparative analysis or cost-benefit studies, it is unknown whether PHP 500,000 per beneficiary grants generate adequate returns, how iFWD PH cost-effectiveness compares to alternative OFW support programs, whether program represents optimal use of DOST resources, or what policy-making basis exists for resource allocation decisions.
  • Limited Reach Within OFW Population: The program has trained 921 OFWs cumulatively (2020-2024) while the Philippine employed abroad population is estimated at 2.5 million as of 2023. This represents only 0.036% of OFW population. It is unclear how to scale to reach broader OFW population while maintaining quality.
  • No Participant Experience Documentation: No systematic documentation exists of participant satisfaction with training quality, perceived effectiveness of mentorship, barriers to business implementation encountered, support gaps identified by entrepreneurs, or feedback on program operations and improvements. Without participant voice, program refinement lacks user perspective.
  • Evaluation and Accountability Deficit: The absence of evaluation mechanisms means no accountability for grant utilization, no learning from failed initiatives, no evidence base for scaling or replication, and policy decisions must rely on anecdote rather than data.

CURATED BY

Tom Hancock

Research Associate
Global Entrepreneurship Network
United Kingdom