The Open Competition and Employee Mobility Clause

Back to Atlas

The Open Competition and Employee Mobility Clause is regulatory policy that favors open competition and employee mobility by prohibiting non-compete agreements that limit an employee’s ability to work in their chosen position.
What are the main aims and objectives?

The Open Competition and Employee Mobility Clause primarily aims to foster a dynamic and innovative business environment by promoting employee freedom and preventing restrictive employment practices. Its main objectives are to ensure workers can freely pursue career opportunities without being hindered by non-compete agreements, stimulate healthy competition among businesses, and drive economic growth through increased labor mobility. By invalidating most non-compete clauses, the law seeks to protect employees' rights to change jobs within their industry, potentially leading to better wages, working conditions, and career advancement. Additionally, it aims to encourage innovation and entrepreneurship by allowing individuals to leverage their skills and experience across different companies or in starting their own ventures. 

How does the program work?

The Open Competition and Employee Mobility operates through a combination of state laws and recent legislative actions, creating a robust framework that prioritizes employee freedom and market competition. At its core, this clause is based on California Business and Professions Code Section 16600, which declares void any contract that restrains an individual from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business. This foundational law effectively nullifies most non-compete agreements in the state.

The implementation of this clause has been further strengthened by recent legislation. Senate Bill 699 (SB 699), which took effect on January 1, 2024, expands the scope of the non-compete ban. It not only prohibits employers from entering into non-compete agreements but also from attempting to enforce such agreements, even if they were signed outside of California. This law gives the clause extraterritorial reach, protecting employees who move to California for work, regardless of where their original employment contract was signed.

Additionally, Assembly Bill 1076 (AB 1076) adds another layer to the clause's effectiveness. It requires employers to notify both current and former employees by February 14, 2024, that any existing non-compete clauses in their contracts are void. This retroactive application, covering agreements with employees employed after January 1, 2022, ensures that even long-standing non-compete clauses are addressed and nullified.

The clause works by empowering employees to challenge non-compete agreements in court. If an employer attempts to enforce a non-compete clause, employees can sue for damages, seek injunctive relief, and recover attorney's fees. This legal recourse acts as a strong deterrent against employers who might consider implementing or maintaining such restrictive agreements.

It's important to note that while the clause is broad in its application, it does have some limitations. It doesn't override an employee's duty of loyalty during their employment, nor does it negate obligations regarding trade secrets. These exceptions ensure that while employee mobility is protected, businesses can still safeguard their legitimate proprietary interests.

What is the overall cost?

There is no direct cost attached to this policy.

How was it implemented?

The Open Competition and Employee Mobility Clause has a long and evolving history, dating back to 1872 when the state first established its public policy favoring open competition and rejecting non-competition agreements. This foundational principle was codified in 1941 as California Business and Professions Code Section 16600, which states that any contract restraining a person from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is void, with limited exceptions.

Over the years, California courts have consistently affirmed and interpreted this law broadly, reinforcing the state's settled public policy in favor of open competition and employee mobility. The implementation of the clause has been primarily through judicial decisions and legislative actions.

A significant milestone in the clause's evolution came in 2008 with the California Supreme Court's decision in Edwards v. Arthur Andersen. This ruling reinforced California's prohibition on covenants not to compete and clarified that even narrowly tailored non-compete agreements were generally unenforceable unless they fell under specific statutory exceptions.

Recent legislative actions have further strengthened and clarified the Open Competition and Employee Mobility Clause. In 2023, two important bills were signed into law: Senate Bill 699 (SB 699) and Assembly Bill 1076 (AB 1076). 

What impact has been measured?

There is currently no information available on the impact of the Open Competition and Employee Mobility Clause. 

What lessons can be learned?

The Open Competition and Employee Mobility offers several benefits to startups and entrepreneurs:

  1. Access to talent: Startups can more easily recruit skilled employees from established companies without fear of legal repercussions. This allows new ventures to quickly build talented teams, even if they can't match the salaries of larger corporations.
  2. Knowledge transfer: Employees can bring their expertise and industry knowledge to new ventures without being restricted by non-compete agreements. This facilitates the flow of ideas and best practices across the startup ecosystem.
  3. Reduced legal risks: Entrepreneurs don't have to worry about potential lawsuits from former employers when starting their own businesses in the same industry. This lowers the barrier to entry for new startups and reduces initial legal costs.
  4. Fostering innovation: The free movement of talent encourages cross-pollination of ideas, leading to more innovation in the startup ecosystem. Entrepreneurs can more easily pivot their businesses or explore new opportunities without being constrained by previous employment agreements.
  5. Competitive advantage: Startups in California can attract talent from other states where non-compete agreements are enforced, giving them a potential edge in recruitment.
  6. Encouraging entrepreneurship: Employees are more likely to take the risk of joining or founding startups when they know they can return to their industry if the venture fails. This creates a more dynamic and risk-tolerant business environment.
  7. Network effects: As talent moves more freely between companies, it creates stronger professional networks, which can be invaluable for startups in terms of partnerships, funding, and customer acquisition.
  8. Faster scaling: Startups can scale more quickly by hiring experienced professionals who can immediately contribute without being held back by non-compete clauses.

CURATED BY

Tom Hancock

Research Associate
Global Entrepreneurship Network
United Kingdom